MR BROWN: Last question. Go ahead.

QUESTION: Thank you.

SECRETARY POMPEO: Yes, sir.

QUESTION: So tomorrow and August 9th marks 75 years since the United States unleased the first atomic bomb attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. So could you tell us your opinion on nuclear arms control, including the future of the New START Treaty between U.S. and Russia?

SECRETARY POMPEO: Yeah. So President Trump, literally since I first met him, first in my role as CIA director and now as Secretary of State, has made clear one of his top priorities is ensuring that we don’t have a really bad day in the world as a result of a nuclear weapon being used, and so we have worked along multiple fronts. For example, we left the INF Treaty because the Russians weren’t complying with that and that was – that had the risk of being destabilizing, because when you have an arms control agreement and only one of the two parties is complying, you have created strategic risk.

But in the last handful of months, we’ve been working diligently to get the three nations that have the largest nuclear capabilities – the United States, Russia, and China – to have a strategic dialogue about how we move forward together to decrease the risk to the world that these massive weapons are used, and we’ve made progress with the Russians. We’ve had two good gatherings; I hope we’ll have one before too long. And we are hopeful that the Chinese will choose to participate. We think it’s in their best interest. We know it’s in the best interest of the world. And for nations that assert they want win-win solutions, that they want good outcomes, that they want to be a player on a global stage, they now have moved to a point where they need to, like the United States and Russia, be prepared to engage in conversations about how you create a strategic situation that reduces the risk that nuclear weapons will be used at any time or any place anywhere in the world.

I hope they’ll participate in that. We hope the Russians will urge them to participate in that and we hope the whole world will come to understand that it’s very important that those three nuclear powers with significant resources and capabilities will all come together to create a more robust, more stable strategic situation with respect to the risks not only of the use of nuclear weapons, but on their proliferation as well.

Great. Thank you, everyone. Have a great day. Thank you.

第一清除运营商，第二清理应用商店，第三清除Apps， 第四清理云计算，第五清理通信电缆
似乎美国是要全面清理了。 鼓励举报并有奖励。

说不好听点，就是想吸别人血，让美国变成第二个中国。自己在做这么糟糕的事情，从不检讨自己，还怪美国怎么怎么的。说到底还是支性难改。

訪客 說：

相較之下，如今美國不但廣闢反中共戰線，更在所有政策領域上對中共做出更強硬的反擊；閉館事件充分顯示主張對中共硬起來的鷹派已佔上風，龐皮歐帶領的外交顧問將對中政策推向數十年來的敵對巔峰，其結果就是採取一連串的制裁、限制與譴責，最後在閉館決定達到最高點。

這支堅信美中在根本上格格不入，也無法並存的反中共團隊，除了主要擘劃人龐皮歐與副國家安全顧問博明（Matthew Pottinger），還有國務院亞太助卿史達偉（David Stilwell），以及兩名出身美國學界的中國學者─龐皮歐的首席中國政策顧問余春茂與龐皮歐的科技顧問蔣濛。甚至成功動員白宮國家安全顧問歐布萊恩、聯邦調查局長瑞伊與司法部長巴爾等資深官員齊聲嗆中共。

此外，龐皮歐今天亦點名萬豪酒店、美國航空、達美航空和聯合航空等大型企業，因為怕觸怒中共，不敢在網站上將台灣列為獨立國家。他表示，自由世界將台灣邊緣化，而後來台灣成為充滿活力的民主國家，便是自立自强的例子。

但像美國給中共政權特別經濟待遇，北京卻要求進入中國的西方企業對人權問題保持緘默。與自由民主價值背道而馳，令人遣憾。他並批評，好萊塢自詡為社會正義仲裁者與美國自由創作中心，卻在面對中共的些微批評時，隨即進行自我審查。這種鴕鳥心態，實在要不得！

至於，能否讓台灣、日本、越南、澳洲等區域周邊國家相信，可以像1947年時任美國國務卿馬歇爾（George Catlett Marshall）的承諾一樣，選擇並依賴美國？龐皮歐回答說：「毫無疑問」。他更指出，能理解外界的選邊站說法，但與其說是在美國和中共之間選邊站，不如說是在自由與暴政之間做抉擇，這正是美國期待各國做出的決定，美國的領導地位也將確保美國會與他們在一起！

如今龐皮歐已吹響反中共號角！看到習大大已將中國經濟「鎖國」（內循環化），自己也四面楚歌，成了「孤家寡人」，末路顯已浮現矣！